algorithm-lzw
The groupant beside algorithms/src/lzw/mod.rs in the Mova repository: what the code computes, what it never does, how to go back from its outputs, its invariants, cost and checks.
Facts
Implementation material. A Mova code model describes this code at one source revision: partial models, finite checks and their stated scope. It is not a reviewed general exposition, and its labels are shown as written, never raised.
Components
| component | label | where |
|---|---|---|
| approximant | partial | approximant |
| ast | partial | syntax.json |
| descriptant | present | descriptant |
| invariant | partial | approximant |
| tests | finite checks | tests |
Obernants
The typed relations around the forward model: the behaviour complement (what the code never does), the reverse reconstruction (every input compatible with an output) and specialised views.
| id | type | label | where |
|---|---|---|---|
behavior_complement | behavior_complement | partial relational specification | behavior_complement |
reverse_reconstruction | reverse_reconstruction | partial relational specification | reverse_reconstruction |
transition_relation | transition_relation | partial relational specification | transition_relation |
finite_arithmetic | finite_arithmetic | partial relational specification | finite_arithmetic |
resource_observation | resource_observation | partial relational specification | resource_observation |
deterministic_ties | deterministic_ties | partial relational specification | deterministic_ties |
Model text
descriptant
Epoch memory โ 2026-10-30
Original bounded byte lzw. Reference: Welch (1984), Computer 17(6), A Technique for High-Performance Data Compression. Prospective equations preceded implementation. Exact semantics and observed checks are distinct from syntax binding. Round-trip cannot alone validate two mutually wrong codecs; retain hand-derived streams and malformed checks. No timing claim or percentage approximant.
model
Mathematical combiner
For source S, partial syntax P(S), forward relation F and typed relations O, the sidecar records (hash(S),P(S),F,O,I). Source identity binds descriptions to bytes but does not prove F. Tests intersect compatible implementations with finite observations. Composition with callers requires domain caps and exact model identity; no global Mova accuracy claim follows. Decoded bytes can have multiple code preimages: AAA admits [65,65,65] and [65,256]. Encode chooses one canonical stream; decoding then reencoding need not preserve arbitrary accepted codes.
approximant
Forward, invariant, and cost
Initial dictionary is all 256 single bytes. On a miss emit w and insert wb while size<4096. Decode appends first(next) to previous; next==size is allowed only with nonempty previous (KwKwK). Freeze dictionary at 4096.
O(nLlog(4096)) encode, O(cL+output) decode, O(4096L+n) storage where L is maximum stored phrase length.
Input/codes cap 65536 first; per-code validity before remaining budget; output cap min(user,65536). Dictionary IDs <=4095; bounded phrase clones may allocate and panic/abort. Empty stream valid.
Invariant: Successful decode output differing from concatenated dictionary phrases is excluded. First code >=256 is invalid; a later code greater than current dictionary size is invalid.
Original implementation informed by Welch (1984), Computer 17(6), A Technique for High-Performance Data Compression; no copied implementation. Exact categorical semantics; no useful certified percentage surrogate is attached. Patience minimality is explicitly unsupported. Finite fixtures do not constitute universal proof.
models
Typed relations
behavior_complement
Successful decode output differing from concatenated dictionary phrases is excluded. First code >=256 is invalid; a later code greater than current dictionary size is invalid.
reverse_reconstruction
Decoded bytes can have multiple code preimages: AAA admits [65,65,65] and [65,256]. Encode chooses one canonical stream; decoding then reencoding need not preserve arbitrary accepted codes.
transition_relation
Initial dictionary is all 256 single bytes. On a miss emit w and insert wb while size<4096. Decode appends first(next) to previous; next==size is allowed only with nonempty previous (KwKwK). Freeze dictionary at 4096.
finite_arithmetic
Input/codes cap 65536 first; per-code validity before remaining budget; output cap min(user,65536). Dictionary IDs <=4095; bounded phrase clones may allocate and panic/abort. Empty stream valid.
resource_observation
O(nLlog(4096)) encode, O(cL+output) decode, O(4096L+n) storage where L is maximum stored phrase length. No callbacks (count zero), no IO, no randomized state. Input errors are values; allocator failures and stack exhaustion are environmental and not caught.
deterministic_ties
Traversal is increasing index; maps are ordered. Myers and decoders have no optimization ties; LZW freezes dictionary rather than clearing it; LZ77 keeps nearest distance; BPE keeps lexicographically smallest pair; patience LIS keeps earliest predecessor and endpoint. These are per-algorithm rules, not arbitrary hash iteration.
tests
Checks
Run cargo test -p mova-algorithms lzw::tests in debug/release twice. Preserve normalized transcripts, compiled negative control, and exact restoration under $MOVA_DATA/runs/octopus-wave25-sequences-2026-10-30. No benchmark evidence yet.
prospective
Prospective model โ 2026-10-30
Original bounded byte lzw implementation. Before implementation: exact transform, deterministic traversal, no callbacks; input cap 65536 (diff 4096), dictionary 4096, output cap min(caller,65536). Allocation may panic/abort; resource checks prevent size-driven overflow but do not certify allocator success. Myers uses bit-vector edit row recurrence with wrapping addition; LZW extends previous phrase by next first byte, freezing at dictionary capacity; LZ77 greedy longest previous match permits overlap; BPE repeatedly merges most frequent pair, lexicographically smallest tie, applying learned merges in order; patience diff recursively anchors unique shared bytes by increasing subsequence and uses delete/insert fallback. Expected costs respectively O(n), O(n * phrase length), O(nwindowmatch), O(mergesnlog n), O(n^3) conservative. Correctness is exact distance or lossless reconstruction; patience edit count is not guaranteed minimal. No percentage approximant justified. Independent DP/exhaustive and round-trip/malformed checks planned; no timing claim.
validation
Observed validation โ 2026-10-30
The five-module batch adds 14 native tests. All pass twice debug and twice release; sorted named test records match across all four runs. Initial integrated library run: 632 passed. Strict library Clippy passed. Each production file has a compiled mutant rejected by a named assertion, followed by byte-for-byte restoration and a passing module rerun: Myers score+1/exhaustive_dp; LZW flipped decoded byte/known_and_malformed; LZ77 match length-1/greedy_overlap_and_invalid; BPE tie comparison >=/ties_and_model_identity; patience anchor Insert instead of Equal/unique_anchor_and_nonminimal_witness.
Each of ten source/test files has paired identical partial syntax projections, refreshed after all mutants were restored. Receipts: $MOVA_DATA/runs/octopus-wave25-sequences-2026-10-30/{focused-debug-1.log,focused-debug-2.log,focused-release-1.log,focused-release-2.log,normalized-,mutations.log,mutant-,restored-*,syntax.log,clippy.log}. No timing or speedup evidence; allocator failures untested. These finite observations and lexical source bindings do not establish a semantic proof or global Mova quality improvement.
This page in Markdown โ https://md.groupants.elamur.ai/free/en/mova/algorithms/src/lzw/mod.rs.groupant/